Front Range 4x4 Upcoming Trail Runs - Add a New Trail Run

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 59 of 59

Thread: Front upper control arms on 2005 LJ

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Member
    #921
    Last Online
    3 Hours Ago
    Location
    Fort Collins
    4x4
    1990 Jeep Wrangler (YJ)
    Posts
    10,057
    User Name
    Jim
    Real Name
    Jim Williamson
    Thanks Given
    2,462
    Thanked 3,008 Times in 2,005 Posts

    Default Re: Front upper control arms on 2005 LJ



    I'll pack the car tonight for an easy departure in the morning.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Member
    #1028
    Last Online
    14 Hours Ago
    Location
    Longmont
    Age
    72
    4x4
    '12 Jeep Wrangler Sport 2.5" lift, 33s, winch
    Posts
    5,073
    User Name
    Tom
    Real Name
    Tom
    Thanks Given
    2,400
    Thanked 1,234 Times in 933 Posts

    Default Re: Front upper control arms on 2005 LJ



    I will be there.
    ___________
    Tom
    -.- . ----- .-- - -.-.

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Member
    #2036
    Last Online
    September 8th, 2023
    Location
    Broomfield
    4x4
    2005 Wrangler Unlimited (LJ)
    Posts
    1,844
    User Name
    open_circuit
    Real Name
    Trent
    Thanks Given
    586
    Thanked 811 Times in 483 Posts

    Default Re: Front upper control arms on 2005 LJ



    All parts and tools that I intended to get are in my hands.

    I also grabbed some bratwurst to throw on the grill for lunch.

  4. The Following 2 Members Say Thanks to open_circuit For This Post:

    Jim (November 15th, 2019),Tom (November 15th, 2019)

  5. #44
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Member
    #2036
    Last Online
    September 8th, 2023
    Location
    Broomfield
    4x4
    2005 Wrangler Unlimited (LJ)
    Posts
    1,844
    User Name
    open_circuit
    Real Name
    Trent
    Thanks Given
    586
    Thanked 811 Times in 483 Posts

    Default Re: Front upper control arms on 2005 LJ



    Thanks Jim, James, and Tom for coming out today and lending a hand. It took about an hour and a half longer than predicted due to a stubborn bushing on the differential housing. The upper control arms mount to a sheet metal bracket welded to the axle on the passenger side, and a solid cast-iron feature on top of the differential on the driver side. Due to the limited contact on the passenger side mount, it was relatively easy to press the bushing out with the ball joint press. However, on the driver side the bushing has much more surface area in contact with the mounting hole since the bracket is a couple inches of cast iron. We had to cut away the rubber interior of this bushing and then use a dremel with a grinding bit to cut a slot through the bushing's metal shell before we were able to successfully beat the bushing out in a crumpled heap.

    We installed the lower control arms fairly easily after replacing the bushings. JKS provided new 10.9 bolts, washers, and locking nuts for the axle-side of each control arm. As we tried to torque the first (passenger-side) of these to the specified 60 ft-lbs, the new bolt snapped. I owe JKS an e-mail to ask about this. I am quite disappointed that their new hardware failed immediately and dramatically. We tried to torque the driver-side bolt, and it felt uncomfortably elastic, so we aborted. Ultimately, we secured the control arms with the old (original) bolts we removed from the failed control arms.

    Failed control arms:


    Failed bolt and suspect bolt:

  6. The Following Member Says Thanks to open_circuit For This Post:

    Tom (November 16th, 2019)

  7. #45
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Member
    #921
    Last Online
    3 Hours Ago
    Location
    Fort Collins
    4x4
    1990 Jeep Wrangler (YJ)
    Posts
    10,057
    User Name
    Jim
    Real Name
    Jim Williamson
    Thanks Given
    2,462
    Thanked 3,008 Times in 2,005 Posts

    Default Re: Front upper control arms on 2005 LJ



    A good project done. It was nice work'n with all. Brats were delicious - thx!

    Traffic on 25 was heavy. "mostly" running at road speed but it was thick the whole trip.

  8. #46
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Member
    #1028
    Last Online
    14 Hours Ago
    Location
    Longmont
    Age
    72
    4x4
    '12 Jeep Wrangler Sport 2.5" lift, 33s, winch
    Posts
    5,073
    User Name
    Tom
    Real Name
    Tom
    Thanks Given
    2,400
    Thanked 1,234 Times in 933 Posts

    Default Re: Front upper control arms on 2005 LJ



    A much more enjoyable day than I would have had otherwise.
    ___________
    Tom
    -.- . ----- .-- - -.-.

  9. #47
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Member
    #1546
    Last Online
    7 Hours Ago
    Location
    Bozeman, MT
    Age
    45
    4x4
    1970CJ5 1958WillysWagon
    Posts
    3,694
    User Name
    FINOCJ
    Real Name
    James Orofino
    Thanks Given
    1,272
    Thanked 1,588 Times in 965 Posts

    Default Re: Front upper control arms on 2005 LJ



    Fun day...always fun wrenching on someone else's jeep.
    ___________
    James Orofino
    1970 CJ5
    1958 Willys Wagon

  10. #48
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Member
    #2036
    Last Online
    September 8th, 2023
    Location
    Broomfield
    4x4
    2005 Wrangler Unlimited (LJ)
    Posts
    1,844
    User Name
    open_circuit
    Real Name
    Trent
    Thanks Given
    586
    Thanked 811 Times in 483 Posts

    Default Re: Front upper control arms on 2005 LJ



    JKS is sending me some replacement hardware. The person who responded says the torque spec should be 45 ft lbs, not 60, and they will update the instructions to clarify this. With how easily that bolt failed, I'm a bit skeptical still. Maybe I'll try to torque down the one remaining bolt to 45 and see if it feels wrong or fails before I both trying to install the new replacement hardware.

  11. #49
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Member
    #1546
    Last Online
    7 Hours Ago
    Location
    Bozeman, MT
    Age
    45
    4x4
    1970CJ5 1958WillysWagon
    Posts
    3,694
    User Name
    FINOCJ
    Real Name
    James Orofino
    Thanks Given
    1,272
    Thanked 1,588 Times in 965 Posts

    Default Re: Front upper control arms on 2005 LJ



    I was thinking that bolt broke way too easily, so I started looking up torque specs for bolts. I generally consider grade 10.9 to be about equivalent to grade 8 in SAE terms and thought it should hole a lot more torque as it was somewhere around a 3/8 bolt I think. Anyway, i am not sure what the metric bolt size was, but guessing it was an M10 (about a 3/8), which for grade 10.9 should have a torque spec of 75Nm (about 55ft-lbs). So if it was an M10, we were pushing past the torque spec trying to get to 60ft-lbs, but it shouldn't break that close to the torque spec. Unless that bolt was smaller diameter than I remember. If it was more like an M8 bolt (5/16), then the grade 10.9 torque spec would be 40Nm (or about 30ft-lbs)...
    ___________
    James Orofino
    1970 CJ5
    1958 Willys Wagon

  12. The Following Member Says Thanks to FINOCJ For This Post:

    open_circuit (November 18th, 2019)

  13. #50
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Member
    #921
    Last Online
    3 Hours Ago
    Location
    Fort Collins
    4x4
    1990 Jeep Wrangler (YJ)
    Posts
    10,057
    User Name
    Jim
    Real Name
    Jim Williamson
    Thanks Given
    2,462
    Thanked 3,008 Times in 2,005 Posts

    Default Re: Front upper control arms on 2005 LJ



    So, would 60Nm be what the spec sheet was meaning when it was saying 60ft-lbs?

  14. #51
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Member
    #2036
    Last Online
    September 8th, 2023
    Location
    Broomfield
    4x4
    2005 Wrangler Unlimited (LJ)
    Posts
    1,844
    User Name
    open_circuit
    Real Name
    Trent
    Thanks Given
    586
    Thanked 811 Times in 483 Posts

    Default Re: Front upper control arms on 2005 LJ



    Jim previously posted:
    "So, would 60Nm be what the spec sheet was meaning when it was saying 60ft-lbs?"

    Instructions are available here:

    https://www.quadratec.com/sites/defa...ms-JKS1652.pdf

    Page 2 shows 60 ft-lbs for TJ, ZJ, and WJ. 55 ft-lbs for XJ and MJ.

  15. #52
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Member
    #1546
    Last Online
    7 Hours Ago
    Location
    Bozeman, MT
    Age
    45
    4x4
    1970CJ5 1958WillysWagon
    Posts
    3,694
    User Name
    FINOCJ
    Real Name
    James Orofino
    Thanks Given
    1,272
    Thanked 1,588 Times in 965 Posts

    Default Re: Front upper control arms on 2005 LJ



    60Nm would be 45ft-lbs...so yes, seems like there is a good chance the torque spec units got mix up....But even so, it worries me than a 10.9 M10 would break before 60ft-lbs as max torque spec is still 55ft-lbs...
    ___________
    James Orofino
    1970 CJ5
    1958 Willys Wagon

  16. #53
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Member
    #921
    Last Online
    3 Hours Ago
    Location
    Fort Collins
    4x4
    1990 Jeep Wrangler (YJ)
    Posts
    10,057
    User Name
    Jim
    Real Name
    Jim Williamson
    Thanks Given
    2,462
    Thanked 3,008 Times in 2,005 Posts

    Default Re: Front upper control arms on 2005 LJ



    I believe ya Trent and I understand James' aspect too. I'm simply looking at this and thinking of NASA's Mars Climate Orbiter mission that spectacularly failed due to an SAE/Metric mixup.

    https://www.wired.com/2010/11/1110ma...server-report/

    A NASA review board found that the problem was in the software controlling the orbiter's thrusters. The software calculated the force the thrusters needed to exert in pounds of force. A separate piece of software took in the data assuming it was in the metric unit: newtons.

    My mind comes around to this quality control question: Should the installed fasteners be at the torque setting they were set at?

  17. #54
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Member
    #2036
    Last Online
    September 8th, 2023
    Location
    Broomfield
    4x4
    2005 Wrangler Unlimited (LJ)
    Posts
    1,844
    User Name
    open_circuit
    Real Name
    Trent
    Thanks Given
    586
    Thanked 811 Times in 483 Posts

    Default Re: Front upper control arms on 2005 LJ



    Yes, I think the flag bolts / nuts should probably also not be at 60 ft-lbs if they are the same grade and size as the hardware from JKS. However, even if I loosen and torque to 45 ft-lbs instead (for both the upper and lower bolts), would the bolt already be considered stressed and suspect? I don't have replacement hardware for the upper (frame) mounting location.

  18. #55
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Member
    #921
    Last Online
    3 Hours Ago
    Location
    Fort Collins
    4x4
    1990 Jeep Wrangler (YJ)
    Posts
    10,057
    User Name
    Jim
    Real Name
    Jim Williamson
    Thanks Given
    2,462
    Thanked 3,008 Times in 2,005 Posts

    Default Re: Front upper control arms on 2005 LJ



    If over-torqued (by a decent amount), I'd replace.

    If under-torqued, I'd set to proper.

    ---

    You should be able to research to see what the factory spec fastener is and what the factory spec torque is. I'd go that route vs. using the questionable re-supplied aftermarket fasteners. You should be able to purchase (pickup at your local dealership parts counter) the fasteners.

  19. #56
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Member
    #2036
    Last Online
    September 8th, 2023
    Location
    Broomfield
    4x4
    2005 Wrangler Unlimited (LJ)
    Posts
    1,844
    User Name
    open_circuit
    Real Name
    Trent
    Thanks Given
    586
    Thanked 811 Times in 483 Posts

    Default Re: Front upper control arms on 2005 LJ



    Probably will be tricky to source a replacement for those flag bolts on the upper control arm frame mount.

  20. #57
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Member
    #1546
    Last Online
    7 Hours Ago
    Location
    Bozeman, MT
    Age
    45
    4x4
    1970CJ5 1958WillysWagon
    Posts
    3,694
    User Name
    FINOCJ
    Real Name
    James Orofino
    Thanks Given
    1,272
    Thanked 1,588 Times in 965 Posts

    Default Re: Front upper control arms on 2005 LJ



    Jim previously posted:
    "I believe ya Trent and I understand James' aspect too. I'm simply looking at this and thinking of NASA's Mars Climate Orbiter mission that spectacularly failed due to an SAE/Metric mixup."

    I would figure the mistake came from JKS direction writer/translater....whomever wrote the directions got the units mixed up...

    Jim previously posted:
    "If over-torqued (by a decent amount), I'd replace.

    If under-torqued, I'd set to proper."

    Although Jim is 100% correct with replacing anything over torqued, and just tightening I'd be less worried about re-using the flag nuts as they are not locking nuts...technically the threads could have been damaged. The front fasteners locking nuts should only be used once even if properly torqued - if under torqued they can be re-used.
    ___________
    James Orofino
    1970 CJ5
    1958 Willys Wagon

  21. #58
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Member
    #921
    Last Online
    3 Hours Ago
    Location
    Fort Collins
    4x4
    1990 Jeep Wrangler (YJ)
    Posts
    10,057
    User Name
    Jim
    Real Name
    Jim Williamson
    Thanks Given
    2,462
    Thanked 3,008 Times in 2,005 Posts

    Default Re: Front upper control arms on 2005 LJ



    I don't think the flag nuts need to be used. While the "holding arm" of the flag nut makes it easy to get the nut onto the end of the bolt, the frame is open to the outside such that a standard locking nut can be easily put onto the bolt end.

    A trick that can help get a standard (non-flag) nut onto the end of that bolt, is to place a piece of paper between the socket and nut and then push the nut into the socket. This will hold the nut nicely in the end of the socket for it to stay put while it's being started onto the bolt. The socket can easily enough be pulled out/off when needed. Sometimes this is too tight and only a sliver of paper - to interface one hex face of the nut-socket - is desired.

  22. #59
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Member
    #2036
    Last Online
    September 8th, 2023
    Location
    Broomfield
    4x4
    2005 Wrangler Unlimited (LJ)
    Posts
    1,844
    User Name
    open_circuit
    Real Name
    Trent
    Thanks Given
    586
    Thanked 811 Times in 483 Posts

    Default Re: Front upper control arms on 2005 LJ



    FINOCJ previously posted:
    "I was thinking that bolt broke way too easily, so I started looking up torque specs for bolts. I generally consider grade 10.9 to be about equivalent to grade 8 in SAE terms and thought it should hole a lot more torque as it was somewhere around a 3/8 bolt I think. Anyway, i am not sure what the metric bolt size was, but guessing it was an M10 (about a 3/8), which for grade 10.9 should have a torque spec of 75Nm (about 55ft-lbs). So if it was an M10, we were pushing past the torque spec trying to get to 60ft-lbs, but it shouldn't break that close to the torque spec. Unless that bolt was smaller diameter than I remember. If it was more like an M8 bolt (5/16), then the grade 10.9 torque spec would be 40Nm (or about 30ft-lbs)..."

    I have the replacement hardware. The bolts are marked as 10MM- 1.50 x 80MM, class 10.9 clear zinc. The nut is called out as 10MM - 1.50 Prevailing torque nut zinc

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. FS: Jeep JK 35" wheels/tires, front driveshafts, RK control arms
    By fredrok in forum For Sale, Wanted, Trade, Free
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: May 21st, 2016, 05:15 PM
  2. adjustable control arms
    By dscowell in forum Tech Help Wanted
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: March 29th, 2014, 06:58 PM
  3. Building Uniball Upper Control Arms
    By ccbruin in forum Tech Help Wanted
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: January 24th, 2014, 07:24 PM
  4. XJ upper control arm question
    By Coonburger in forum Tech Help Wanted
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: March 2nd, 2013, 11:57 PM
  5. Back to control arms
    By DETN8R in forum Build Threads
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: May 11th, 2008, 09:13 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
BACK TO TOP