Now that they have alienated a huge segment of their users, they offer a "Competitive" package. I will admit, I am enticed.
What are the options and associated cost for hosting images?
Now that they have alienated a huge segment of their users, they offer a "Competitive" package. I will admit, I am enticed.
What are the options and associated cost for hosting images?
___________
The Lost Boys motto: We don't know where we're going, but we'll be there for awhile. :)
Honestly I get that running such a site would need fees of some sorts to get by. But with the way they did what they did causing so many to have there posts depending on the site and hold the users hostage. To me is unconscionable in my book! Soooo Don't think I would ever do bisuness with photo bucket.
In somewhat related news... I hear that SmugMug just purchased Flickr
Some think that Flickr is not much longer for this world - but I'm not so certain as to death
(though I don't use any third party photo hosting aside from my web site)
Yeah I know unless I watermark my photos once I post them directly to a site they are no longer really mine. But I'm not a photographer and I like that I can go to a site and they are there, If I ever loose them!